Getty
During a bruising week for the Duke of Sussex, Prince Harry’s self‑described “life’s work” came to an abrupt halt as Britain’s High Court found in favour of Associated Newspapers in his $100 million phone‑hacking case.
Associated Newspapers hailed the ruling as “an overwhelming vindication of our journalism” after all 97 allegations of unlawful information‑gathering by Harry and his co‑claimants were dismissed.
In a blistering response, Harry refused to concede defeat, saying he had come to court seeking justice and accountability but had received neither.
“It is a complete and obvious whitewash but sadly not altogether unexpected,” he said in a joint statement with Baroness Doreen Lawrence. “The lengths to which the Court has gone to exonerate the Mail is as shocking as it is totally unwarranted.”
But the outcome he may never have expected is that he has now escalated into a potentially catastrophic financial and reputational crisis — one that could follow him for years.
A massive financial cost now looms
Prince Harry, Elton John, Sadie Frost, Elizabeth Hurley, Doreen Lawrence, David Furnish and Sir Simon Hughes could now be on the hook for Associated Newspapers’ legal bill.
The group had accused the publisher of violating their privacy from the early 1990s through to the 2010s by tapping phones, intercepting voicemails and obtaining personal information through deception.
The newspapers have long rejected the claims as “preposterous,” insisting the stories in question were sourced lawfully from friends, royal aides and publicists rather than covert surveillance.
The court ultimately agreed, with Judge Matthew Nicklin ruling that the claimants had “failed to prove their pleaded allegations”.
Associated Newspapers has since revealed it intends to pursue legal costs of up to $100 million, a hefty sum Harry is widely understood not to have access to amid financial difficulties since stepping away from royal duties.
The real cost for Harry is much worse
The financial fallout is only part of the story. The deeper wound is reputational.
Harry’s case rested on his insistence that his “social circles were not leaky”. But evidence showed otherwise, including messages where he confronted friends for doing just that.
“It’s Charlotte Griffiths, so any one of your mates who knows M is coming has gossiped,” Harry texted Thomas Inskip after the Daily Mail diarist revealed Meghan Markle would accompany him to a 2017 wedding in Jamaica.
Harry was also caught maintaining a close personal relationship with Griffiths, despite claiming he “cut contact” after one meeting.
“Miss our movie snuggles!!” he wrote to her in one message in January 2012.
Following the revelations, Editor‑in‑Chief Paul Dacre claimed the judgment “fully exonerated our journalists and exposed the baseless nature of these allegations.”
“Every single article was legitimately sourced,” he said.
By taking the stand, Harry has had to relive personal moments in public. And moving forward, he has inadvertently given credence to tabloid stories he once insisted were false.
Inside Prince Harry’s very bad week
The legal loss was only the latest blow in a string of failures.
While his current trip to London had carried hopes of reconciliation — after Harry said he would bring his children to meet the King — it has again collapsed into confusion, miscommunication and royal frostiness.
Within moments of Harry confirming to press that he had accepted an offer to stay at Buckingham Palace, it emerged the offer had been withdrawn after he missed a deadline.
Harry’s spokesperson lashed out at the Palace in response.
“It is unclear why, having formally accepted the accommodation offer, it has now been withdrawn at the last moment.”
After weeks of back‑and‑forth, it appears the King has finally had enough after Harry cited not receiving tax-payer funded security in London for his reason why Meghan, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet did not accompany him to London.
Harry had hoped his family would join him in Birmingham on July 10 for an Invictus event before seeing his father. But given Harry has publicly criticised the King for failing to support him in his battles with the tabloids and over security, Charles may now be the last person he wishes to see.
“I might learn to endure the press, even forgive their abuse, I might, but my own family’s complicity, that was going to take longer to get over. Pa’s office, Willy’s office, enabling these fiends, if not outright collaborating,” Harry previously wrote in Spare.
Business as usual for The Firm
“Get ready for a week like you’ve never seen before,” several British royal reporters told me — and they are right.
Senior royals are expected to be out daily in an effort to overwhelm the crisis surrounding Harry’s visit.
On the day of Harry’s arrival, the Princess of Wales made a surprise visit to Evelina Children’s Hospital on July 6, smiling with young patients and learning about treatment programs.
Meanwhile in Dorset, the King climbed into a tank during his first visit to the Royal Tank Regiment since becoming Colonel‑in‑Chief.
On July 7, as Harry carried out an Invictus engagement at Chatham House — maintaining a stiff upper lip as the verdict was delivered — Prince William was also in London visiting the London Welsh School.
Despite being just 20 kilometres apart, it is unimaginable to think the brothers would meet.
Distance, it seems, remains the least of the obstacles on the road to reconciliation with the royal family.
